Slope Stability Analysis, Design, and Repair Services
Alpha Adroit Engineering Ltd provides slope stability analysis, slope design, slope failure investigation, and slope and landslide repair. Alpha Adroit also offers consulting services for preventive and remedial measures for small scale and large scale landslides throughout Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan. Projects in Yukon, Nunavut, and Northwest Territories may be considered subject to prior registration.
— Call us Toll-Free: 1-844-4-ADROIT (1-844-423-7648) or please contact us here for more information.
This article provides a brief description of the required knowledge and analysis techniques for slope stability analysis, slope failure repair, and other geotech aspects related to human-made and natural slopes. This article is not intended to be comprehensive or all-inclusive.
Knowledge Required for Slope Stability Analysis
For slope stability analyses to be useful, they must represent the correct problem, correctly formulated (modeled), and this requires:
— mastery of the principles of soil and rock mechanics;
— precise knowledge of geology and site conditions (including also topography, stratigraphy, groundwater conditions, and water bodies in contact with the slope);
— accurate knowledge of the properties and mechanical behavior of the soils and rocks at the site; and,
— expertise in conducting correct and representative numerical and computational analysis for Slope Stability Analysis purposes.
Slope Stability Analysis techniques
The difference between undrained and drained conditions in slope stability analysis is time.
Undrained signifies a condition where changes in loads occur more rapidly than water can flow in or out of the soil. The pore pressures increase or decrease in response to the changes in loads.
Drained signifies a condition where changes in load are slow enough or remain in place long enough so that water can flow in or out of the soil, permitting the soil to reach a state of equilibrium with regard to water flow. The pore pressures in the drained condition are controlled by the hydraulic boundary conditions and are not affected by the changes in loads.
Analyses of drained conditions
Drained conditions are those where changes in load are slow enough or where they have been in place long enough so that all of the soils reach a state of equilibrium and the loads cause no excess pore-water pressures.
In drained conditions, pore pressures are controlled by hydraulic boundary conditions. The water within the soil may be static, or it may be seeping steadily, with no change in the seepage over time and no increase or decrease in the amount of water in the soil. If these conditions prevail in all the soils at a site, or if these conditions can reasonably approximate the conditions at a site, a drained analysis is appropriate.
A drained slope stability analysis is performed using:
— Total unit weights
— Effective stress shear strength parameters
— Pore pressures determined from hydrostatic water levels or steady seepage analyses
Analyses of undrained conditions
Undrained conditions are those where changes in loads occur more rapidly than water can flow in or out of the soil. The pore pressures are controlled by the behavior of the soil in response to changes in external loads. If these conditions prevail in the soils at a site, or if these conditions can reasonably approximate the conditions at a site, an undrained analysis is appropriate.
An undrained slope stability analysis is performed using:
— Total unit weights
— Total stress shear strength parameters
Progressive Failure of Slopes
An "implicit assumption" of the Limit Equilibrium Method of Slope Stability Analyses is that the soils exhibit plastic (ductile) stress-strain behavior (some may consider it as an intrinsic deficiency of this method).
Progressive failure is a strong possibility in the case of excavated slopes in overconsolidated clays and shales, particularly stiff-fissured clays and shales. These materials have brittle stress-strain characteristics, and they contain high horizontal stresses, often higher than the vertical pressure.
When an excavation is made in stiff fissured clay or shale, the excavated slope rebounds horizontally; shear stresses are very high at the toe of the slope, and there is a tendency for failure to begin at the toe and progress back beneath the crest. With time, the slope would continue to rebound into the cut, due to a delayed response to the unloading from the excavation, and possibly also due to swelling of the clay as its water content increases following the reduction in stress.
Progressively, through this process, failure would spread around the slip surface, without ever mobilizing the peak shear strength simultaneously at all points along the slip surface.
Because progressive failure can occur for soils with brittle stress-strain characteristics, peak strengths shall not be used for these soils in limit equilibrium analyses; using peak strengths for brittle soils in slope stability analysis can lead to an inaccurate and unconservative assessment of the slope stability.
Experience with slopes in overconsolidated clays, particularly fissured clays, has shown that "fully softened strengths" are appropriate for these materials in cases where slickensides have not developed, and "residual strengths" are appropriate in cases where slickensides have developed.
Loading Conditions Frequently Considered for Earth Slopes
— End-of-construction stability
The end-of-construction stability analysis is analyzed using drained or undrained strengths, depending on the permeability of the soil.
— Long-term stability analysis
The analysis reflects conditions after swelling and consolidation are complete and is analyzed using drained strengths and pore water pressures corresponding to steady-state seepage conditions.
— Rapid drawdown
This condition removes the stabilizing effect of external water pressures and subjects the slope to increased shear stress. Either drained or undrained strengths are used, depending on the permeability of the soil.
Earthquakes subject slopes to cyclically varying stresses and may cause a reduction in the shear strength of the soil as a result of cyclic loading. Shear strengths measured in cyclic loading tests are appropriate for analyses of stability during earthquakes.
— Staged construction
Slope stability analysis for staged construction of embankments requires consolidation analyses to estimate the increase in effective stresses that result from the partial consolidation of the foundation.
— Surcharge loading
Depending on whether the load is temporary or permanent, and whether the soil drains quickly or slowly, undrained or drained strengths may be appropriate. If the surcharge loading occurs shortly after construction, the undrained strengths would be the same as those used for end-of-construction stability.
However, if the load is imposed after the soil has had time to drain (consolidate or expand), the undrained strengths may be different and would be estimated using the same procedures as those used to estimate undrained strengths for rapid drawdown.
— Partial submergence and intermediate water levels
For the upstream slopes of dams and other slopes where the level of an adjacent body of water influences stability, the lowest water level usually produces the most adverse conditions.
In the case of slopes that contain zones of materials with different strength characteristics, the factor of safety of the upstream slope may be lower with a water level at some elevation between the top and the toe of the slope. Repeated trials must be used to determine the most critical water level for these conditions.
Back-analysis (or back-calculation) is the process of determining the conditions and establishing a suitable model of the slope from a slope failure case.
Useful information on the conditions in the slope at the time of the failure can be understood when a slope fails due to sliding: at the time of failure, the factor of safety against sliding is unity (1.0). This knowledge and an appropriate method of analysis can be used to develop a model of the slope at the time it failed. The model will consist of the unit weights and shear strength properties of the soil(s), groundwater and pore- water pressure conditions, and the method of analysis (including failure mechanisms). Such a model can be used for:
— understanding and evaluating the cause(s) of failure (forensic engineering)
— back-calculating material properties at the time of failure
— analysis, design, and evaluation of the effectiveness of the remedial measures
One should note that:
- If the location of the slip surface is not known, back-analysis can calculate only one shear strength parameter (c, c' or Φ, Φ').
- Back-calculation of an average shear strength expressed as a cohesion, c (Φ = 0) can produce misleading results when a slope has failed under long-term drained conditions.
- Each combination of cohesion and friction angle that produces a factor of safety of 1 provides a unique location for the critical slip surface. Accordingly, the location of the slip surface can be used to calculate unique values for both cohesion (c, c') and friction angle (Φ, Φ').
- Using the location of the slip surface to back-calculate both cohesion and friction has had mixed success and does not seem to work when there is a significant progressive failure or distinct layering and inhomogeneities in the slope.
- The degree of uncertainty in the back-calculated shear strength parameter will be no less than the degree of uncertainty in all of the other variables that affect the stability analysis. In fact, the back-analysis should be conceived as a back-analysis to determine all of the variables that apply to the failure, not only shear strength parameters. It is essential to use all the information that is known or can be estimated by other means before performing the back-analysis, such as:
—knowledge of the shear strength of soils and how the shear strength varied with depth
—knowledge of drained and undrained conditions
—knowledge of slip surface(s)
—knowledge of historical slope and groundwater events
—knowledge of historical human and seismic activities at the site
—knowledge of groundwater and pore-water pressures in soils
—knowledge of natural slope conditions, the movements that had already taken place, and residual strength
Slope Stabilization and Repair
One should understand the causes and the nature of a slope failure before embarking on repair action. When investigating what caused a slope failure, one shall remember that there may be more than a single cause.
Thorough geological study and detailed exploration are the first steps to investigate slope failures. Topographic surveys and measurements on surface markers help to define the area affected and the magnitudes of vertical and horizontal movements. The location of the shear zone can often be determined using test borings, accessible borings, trenches, or slope indicators. Piezometers and observation wells can be used to determine groundwater levels within the slope.
When soil strengths and other conditions have been assessed through back-analysis, it "might be" justified to use lower-than-conventional factors of safety for the stabilized slope.
Factors governing the selection of the method of slope stabilization and repair
One needs to consider the following factors when choosing a technically feasible method for slope stabilization:
— What is the purpose of stabilizing the slope? Is it to prevent further large movements? Is it to restore the bearing resistance of the moving ground?
— How much time is available?
— How accessible is the site, and what types of construction equipment can be mobilized there?
— What would be the cost of the repair?
Commonly used methods of stabilization include:
— Drainage is by far the most frequently used means of stabilizing slopes. It can be used alone or in combination with other methods and often provides effective stabilization at relatively low cost. Drainage improves slope stability in two ways:
(1) it reduces pore pressures within the soil, thereby increasing effective stress and shear strength; and
(2) it reduces the driving forces of water pressures in cracks.
— Flattening a slope reduces the shear stresses along potential sliding surfaces, increasing the factor of safety.
— Prestressed anchors and anchored walls do not require slope movement before they impose the restraining
— Conventional gravity retaining walls, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls, and soil nail walls, which are not prestressed, must move before they can develop resistance to stabilize a landslide.
—Piles or drilled shafts that extend through a sliding mass, into the more stable soil beneath, can be used to improve slope stability. A combination of Limit Equilibrium Method of Slope Stability Analyses and p-y analyses can be used to design piles or drilled shafts to achieve the desired increase in the factor of safety of the slope.
— Slopes have been stabilized using lime piles, grouting with cement, vegetation, thermal treatment, and construction of a reinforced concrete bridge on the ground surface, followed by excavation of soil from beneath the bridge to unload the head of a landslide.
— When a sliding mass has been disturbed significantly as the result of slope movement, and the slide area must support structures or pavements, it may be necessary to excavate and replace the entire sliding mass. Excavation and replacement, with proper compaction and drains beneath the fill, provide a very reliable means of restoring full usefulness to a slide area. The cost of this method is significant when the surface of sliding is deep beneath the ground.
Alpha Adroit Engineering Ltd provides:
—Stability analysis of natural and human-made slopes including excavations, embankments, tailings dams, water dams, dikes (dykes), dumps and fills
—Design of shallow and deep open excavations, open pit mines, waste dumps, and high embankments
—Analysis of structural stability of rock masses and global stability of soil, rock, ore, and waste masses
—Advanced coupled stress-deformation, seepage, seismic, and limit-equilibrium analysis
—Design of alternative instability prevention and landslide remediation measures (45 methods available! Contact us!)
Some of Alpha Adroit's high profile slope stability analysis and remediation projects include several slope stability studies, analysis, and remediation design projects for Riverbend slope failures in Edmonton, Alberta, re-development of old sites abutting slopes of North Saskatchewan River valley, new land developments bordering creeks (such as Whitemud Creek, Blackmud Creek, etc), and forensic investigation of landslides (failure investigation and expert witness).
We offer our slope stability analysis, design, and repair services throughout Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan. We also provide services in international locations directed through our headquarters office in Edmonton, Alberta. Major cities include Edmonton, Calgary, Red Deer, Fort McMurray (AB— Alberta), Vancouver (BC— British Columbia), and Saskatoon (SK— Saskatchewan). Projects in Yukon, Nunavut, and Northwest Territories may be considered subject to prior registration.
Please refer to:
- Advanced soil and rock testing services for slope stability analysis
- Geotechnical engineering services for slope stability analysis, design, and repair in Alberta
- Contact us here